|
Remedy is underwhelmed by the response of some of the medical profession to the proposed change to the running of the NHS. We feel that the absolute hostility shown by some vocal representatives is not representative of all medical professionals. And whilst there a few unresolved problems, such as case cherry-picking or training by ‘any willing providers’, the general direction of these changes is the correct one.
We firmly believe that the most effective way to manage staff, improve services and raise morale is to give more power to local staff. We would like to see an end to the central management ideology that has been a professional blight in recent years. And we also hope that transferring decision-making into the hands of practicing clinicians will reduce the dominance of the administroids whose perspectives are often divorced from clinical realities.
We strongly support the principle of an NHS that is free at the point of use, based on need rather than the ability to pay. But if we want to sustain the NHS for future generations then we need to improve the way care is evaluated administered and delivered.
We therefore support the idea that improved results for patients can come from giving clinicians the power to shape services around their patients needs - provided that appropriate checks and balances are in place to minimize health inequalities.
For the past decade we have had a tick-box system, based far too heavily on volumes of work and waiting times. This has not worked, has introduced perverse incentives such as those for private providers of independent sector treatment centres, and has led to a management-driven form-filling agenda, rather than one focused on patient care.
Matthew Shaw, co-founder of RemedyUK, says ‘We believe that by returning leadership to the hands of clinicians the NHS can improve decision making in the tough climate that we face. And we believe that, whilst not abandoning the fight over individual areas of concern, it is important to consider the overall shape of these proposals. The wood is important as well as the trees.’
Meanwhile we remain concerned that the budgetary constraints - Nicholson’s Challenge of £15billion efficiency savings by 2015 - are receiving insufficient attention. Consideration of the budget and the direction of the new health reforms are separate issues and must be approached in different lights. |